Lately, I've been antsy to start running again -- I stopped in June due to health issues and now that they are resolved, I am preparing to get back to it. So it's not surprising that as I wander through the neighborhood that will be mine in November, I sometimes think about where I will run.
I haven't just been thinking about it -- I've also talked to my fiance, who lives there now, about running routes in his neighborhood. The conversation went something like this:
"The running path down by the river -- is it safe?"
"I think your greatest danger is being hit by a bike." [Brief excursus about runners being hit by cyclists.] "I like running towards town better."
"Yeah, but I don't like running along main roads."
"There's a bridge over the highway so you won't get hit. There are some roads back here too that might be good. There's a big hill and lots of stairs that lead you to a park."
"That doesn't look like it'd be long enough. I'll probably go by the path."
"I don't like it in the winter. It's not very well lit."
[Moment of revelation for both of us: we are talking about different dangers.]
"Of course, I don't have the same concerns as a lady runner..."
I need feminism because my concerns when choosing a running path should not be dictated by my gender. That conversation brought to mind this collection of students explaining why they need feminism.
FEMINISM. (You know I'm on board.)
ReplyDeleteThe sign about female economists really hit home. A related piece I saw recently, about female journalists' brands (or lack thereof):
Warning: it's a good piece, but there's a bit of language from the reliably-funny, inevitably-salty Ann Friedman: http://bit.ly/177mmS8
(And here's a related piece featuring some lady journos, which blessed us all with the amazing phrase "low-maintenance lady swagger"): http://bit.ly/1a1w4Ih
Love that phrase :-)
ReplyDelete